| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
delliott00 Horse Mullet

Joined: 01 Oct 2008 Posts: 234 Location: Austin and Padre Isles
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| frayed wrote: |
Not sure about those bumpers. Looks like I'll have some work for IMS with whatever I end up with. Need to make sure the rear receiver is up to the task of towing, and I don't need all the brushgaurd bodywork up front. |
LOL... That just the thing about brush guards. 99% of them have never "brushed" anything. Especially on SUVs. Sorta like saying "look how rugged a guy I would be if I actually had the cajones to get off the pavement and try"..... Austin is full of them folks. Good thing you got a brush guard on your escalade, pal. I can definitely see you taking that chromed up chevy out muddin around.
Now for a ranch truck, gotta have one I suspect. But I actually think the F250s look a whole lot better without all that stuff. Not to mention the mileage hit. My old boss added one and lost 2mpg on the freeway.
-Dave "got 3 turbo 4x4s but none of em are trucks so I'll just borrow Frayed's" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rebecca of Sunnybrookfarm Full Grown Flour Bluffian

Joined: 01 May 2008 Posts: 3974
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| delliott00 wrote: | Good thing you got a brush guard on your escalade, pal. I can definitely see you taking that chromed up chevy out muddin around.
-Dave "got 3 turbo 4x4s but none of em are trucks so I'll just borrow Frayed's" |
LOL! _________________
| Central Scrutinizer wrote: | | Thanks for the Memories, Ranger Rick. |
| ziacatcher wrote: | | However I bet if you were fishing naked Ranger Rick would have a problem with that |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DBE1982 Flour Bluffian in training
Joined: 15 Apr 2006 Posts: 376
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
7.3 = good engine
6.0= Crap
6.4= More crap
If you are going to get a diesel, find a 7.3, or find a 5.9 cummins. I would go standard 100% for sure, with the power the diesels put out, auto's really dont handle it well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
robul Full Grown Flour Bluffian

Joined: 26 Jun 2007 Posts: 2677
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DBE1982 wrote: | 7.3 = good engine
6.0= Crap
6.4= More crap
If you are going to get a diesel, find a 7.3, or find a 5.9 cummins. I would go standard 100% for sure, with the power the diesels put out, auto's really dont handle it well. |
true story.. Unless of course its the allison.. But that comes in a duramax.. Which are awesome.. As long as you dont expect to keep the truck very long.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Blast-n-Cast Full Grown Flour Bluffian
Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 1142
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have a 2002 F350 4x4 with 120K My dad has a 2002 F350 with 170K and my brother has a 2002 with 155k without any issues with the tranny. I did have to replace a seal that heated up down PINS a while back and dumped my fluid but there was no harm done to the tranny. The 7.3 is the way to go. You can pull anything with it. My dad pulls a lot and has never had issues. Here is a pic of him hauling hay 14 round bales weighing in at about 1100 lbs each not to mention the weight of the trailer and it pulls with ease. I have a buddy who is selling his 2003 (last year you could get 7.3) that has less than 30K on it. He has a work truck so it sits in his driveway. PM me if you want his info.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frayed Full Grown Flour Bluffian

Joined: 19 Jun 2008 Posts: 1535 Location: Austin and a lil East of the Bluff
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Blast-n-Cast wrote: | I have a 2002 F350 4x4 with 120K My dad has a 2002 F350 with 170K and my brother has a 2002 with 155k without any issues with the tranny. I did have to replace a seal that heated up down PINS a while back and dumped my fluid but there was no harm done to the tranny. The 7.3 is the way to go. You can pull anything with it. My dad pulls a lot and has never had issues. Here is a pic of him hauling hay 14 round bales weighing in at about 1100 lbs each not to mention the weight of the trailer and it pulls with ease. I have a buddy who is selling his 2003 (last year you could get 7.3) that has less than 30K on it. He has a work truck so it sits in his driveway. PM me if you want his info.
 |
Dang, 16,000 lbs? That's a lot! PM sent. _________________ Jeff
Get Busy
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JLKing Horse Mullet
Joined: 06 Jan 2008 Posts: 110 Location: North Padre
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My brother works for a diesel repair shop and from what he sees, the most trouble free diesels are the 7.3 Ford, the 5.9 Cummins and the LBZ series Duramax (06'-07').
You can't go wrong with a 7.3. The 6.0's are garbage and nobody has the bugs worked out of the new emissions choked diesels yet... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Blast-n-Cast Full Grown Flour Bluffian
Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 1142
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| PM answered |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JLKing Horse Mullet
Joined: 06 Jan 2008 Posts: 110 Location: North Padre
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="frayed"] | Blast-n-Cast wrote: |
Dang, 16,000 lbs? That's a lot! PM sent. |
That's well over 20k with the trailer. Probably close to 28k when you figure in the truck weight.
Modern diesels are getting stupid on the power. The old 7.3 can pull anything the truck and it's components can safely handle, and the newer diesels are considerably more powerful.
I know a hotshot driver who had a large load going to a local refinery and he didn't have any of his big trucks available, so he hooked up to one of his 6.0 Ford duallys. He only had to go a couple of blocks and he crossed the scales at the plant at 42k, truck trailer and load. He says engine pulled it without too much trouble, but the brakes wouldn't hardly stop it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frayed Full Grown Flour Bluffian

Joined: 19 Jun 2008 Posts: 1535 Location: Austin and a lil East of the Bluff
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
42,000 lbs?
Glad I wasn't on the road with this guy.
You know, even the current f150s have an 11k tow rating (though they don't have the combined weight rating of 3/4 ton trucks). Unless I go with some sort of offshore boat, the diesel 3/4 ton is overkill. . . but I surely don't want to buy a 1/2 ton then sell it to get a heavier duty machine. _________________ Jeff
Get Busy
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skunked Member White Shrimper Boot Club

Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 781 Location: Corpus Christi
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I chipped my 7.3 at 20,000 miles without doing anything else. Set it to the highest setting. It runs like a sports car and gets better fuel economy than most trucks on the market. Like I said before, the only reason I ain't driving a new one is cause I'm not getting rid of this one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bk005 Member White Shrimper Boot Club

Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 511 Location: San Antonio :(
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
7.3 are alot easier to work on, and dont have the injector and head issues like the 6.0. Ive had a couple of 7.3L and had no issues with them. Chips programmers hopped up injectors/ turbos, and they still held together. Do that to my buddies 6.0's and they were blowing head gaskets and injectors like crazy. 6.4's have tons of smog crap, but there is work arounds
A beater cummings would make a great haul truck to, just the body will fall apart around the motor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
allwheel4x Horse Mullet
Joined: 17 Dec 2007 Posts: 197 Location: Flour Bluff
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 6:22 pm Post subject: Re: OT: tow vehicles, anyone run a 7.3L ford diesel? |
|
|
| frayed wrote: | Looking at used pickups right now. Lots on the market. . . all higher mileage. My bro runs a 2002 7.3L powerstroke and has 250k miles on it, no problems.
Any of you running one? What's your experience? | I'm running a 96 F350 4x4 coming up on 400,000 miles.Still runs fine and is auto trans,has pulled about every thing pullable all over the state.Nothing major replaced-camshaft position sensor-alternator-thats about it.Run good oil(syn)and do regular maint.My son drives a 97F250 in Dallas and also has few problems-vacumn pump-usual maint-has about 150,000 on it-looks like new.Neighbor runs a 2001F250 and pulls a humongus fifth wheel and boat at the same time-no problems-auto too-all are7.3s. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JLKing Horse Mullet
Joined: 06 Jan 2008 Posts: 110 Location: North Padre
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| frayed wrote: |
You know, even the current f150s have an 11k tow rating (though they don't have the combined weight rating of 3/4 ton trucks). Unless I go with some sort of offshore boat, the diesel 3/4 ton is overkill. . . but I surely don't want to buy a 1/2 ton then sell it to get a heavier duty machine. |
That's good information.
I've always been a GM guy, but they are dead to me now that "we the tax payer" have been royally screwed over in Obama's union bailout.
I have a travel trailer that goes about 10k loaded, and I didn't want to buy a new emissions choked, 6.4 Ford diesel to pull it, so it sounds like the new F150 will be right up my alley next year. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JayandCoyote Flour Bluffian in training

Joined: 13 Oct 2006 Posts: 405 Location: Corpus Christi-Southside
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have a 2001 F250 with only 135K miles. The transmission went out at 45K and it was replaced under warranty by Covert in Austin. The front 4x4 locking hubs/switch were junk on the 2001 and they were only used for that year (from 7.3L forum). That picture of the white truck looks like a 2001 or 2002 (no turn signal on mirrors?). Another problem I had was with the o-rings on the water drain on the fuel filter housing. The low sulfur diesel makes the rubber shrink. I replaced the o-rings for 20cents and have not had any more diesel leaking. One of the biggest problems with these trucks is people love to break into them. The door handle is easy to pop on these things even the new improved replacement handle they have now is crap. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|